![]() How To Complete All Xbox Game Pass Quests In 2023 company while protecting or favoring a foreign company's interests?Īll Xbox Games With Mouse & Keyboard Support Even if she got it all last week, even if they asked her to speak up, is there validity to what she says?Īre there anti-competitive practices in place in Japan exacerbating this imbalance? Is the FTC scrutinizing a U.S. It will always amount to upwards of 20-40x MS's market share in Japan.Īs for the senator, she is a senator for Washington (MS's home state), speaking at 'The President’s 2023 Trade Policy Agenda', and the $500k was over 30 years. There is no world where I buy a Switch.Įither way the previous quote we heard was 96% vs. If there was no Series X, I would buy a PS. Additionally, I have a PC and a Series X. Not that it is an outrageous concept - Sony has been more effective (or focused on) at blocking 3rd party games from Xbox than PC lately. Somehow some people conveniently gloss over this, or contract selective amnesia. Mon 27th Mar Sony and regulatory bodies were the ones that eliminated Nintendo and PC from the equation, in an attempt to block the ABK deal in the first place.And now I can start to get excited, as it very well looks like this deal is going to go through. But it sure is nice to see this stuff finally being acknowledged. Now do I think we need to go down the rabbit hole and go after Sony? Eh not entirely. That’s about as close to the nineteenth century monopolistic power plays as you can get (thinking about the railroad and oil industries and how they reinforced their dominant position through practes like this but for their own markets). The deals to buy rights (at reduced cost due to market position) on third party games for both marketing and exclusivity, and then include preventions for gamepass, or in some cases even coming to Xbox at all, is obvious manipulation of the market from a market leader. However, the part where the JFTC allows Sony, as market leader, to engage in monopolistic practices without regulation is most likely fact. The 98% comment, pertaining to only Xbox series and ps5, doesn’t reflect the whole market in truth. There is both truth and exaggeration here. I would have bought both Starfield and Redfall if they released on PS but neither of those interest me enough to invest in anything else just to play them so I guess that's one sale they've lost out on □ It's a hypothetical scenario for sure but also possible. My point really is that if you are in the position where you are forced so subscribe to game pass to play a game that you can't play otherwise and that subscription needs to run past the point where you've paid more money for the sub than you would have buying the game outright then that's where my math is coming from. Although I do have some friends where Call of Duty is the only game that they play all year round so perhaps that's a better example? And just to be slightly cheeky, CoD WILL be on game pass, GTA HAS been on game pass and isn't EA Play available through game pass? Not the current version but FIFA is on their list of games. I just had e some examples of games that I have played for more than 7 months to show that it is perfectly possible to be playing a game for more than 7 months. You said that you weren't sure who would play a single game for more than 7 months I never said anything about it being the only game you played, just the only one that you were needing to sign up for a subscription to play if that was your only realistic option. Xbox's market hold in the US, so there's an argument there to be made about Xbox trying to further compete.Īpologies, I think we seem to have confused each other somewhere. Sony clearly has a much bigger percentage of the 'high-end' market in its home nation vs. ![]() However, if even remotely accurate the stats do make for interesting reading, and could certainly help Microsoft's case for expanding its gaming division with the merging of Xbox and Activision Blizzard. The 98% figure seems to only count Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 related games (if the senator is using this recent FTC definition of the market), so that does cut off a huge portion of gamers in the region. The senator says that she's merely been "told" these facts, so we're not sure how accurate the claims are to be honest. "I'm told that Sony controls a monopoly of 98% of the high-end game market, yet Japan's government has allowed Sony to engage in blatant anti-competitive conduct through exclusive deals and payments to game publishers." As part of talks on 'The President’s 2023 Trade Policy Agenda', Cantwell claims she's heard that Sony "controls a monopoly of 98% of the high-end game market" in Japan, and that the PlayStation owner has partaken in "blatant anti-competitive conduct through exclusive deals and payments to game publishers". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |